Rewrite 
Jay-Z’s legal team says the Jane Doe accusing him of a 2000 rape alongside Diddy should have her identity “disclosed immediately.”
In a motion to deny plaintiff’s request to proceed anonymously, as pointed out by frequently cited independent reporter Meghann M. Cuniff, Jay calls for either the accuser’s identity to be revealed or for the complaint itself to be dismissed outright. The filing, dated Dec. 9, sees Jay’s legal team echoing many of the arguments made in a statement shared to Roc Nation’s X account over the weekend, including criticisms of the Texas-based lawyer behind the suit, Tony Buzbee.
“For months, an extortionate campaign has been targeting this named Defendant under cover of darkness,” the motion reads. “That campaign was cynical and calculated to force payment of an exorbitant sum of money. Defendant would have to pay X millions of dollars irrespective of the truth, or else.”
Jay “refused to pay” in response to this alleged effort, per the filing, at which point the accuser and “her self-promoting counsel” are said to have gone to “extraordinary lengths” in an effort to “shut down fair defense” on Jay’s side. Elsewhere in the docs, it’s argued that there is precedent for requiring the accuser’s name to be made public, with Jay’s legal team underscoring their previous criticisms of Buzbee, like so:
“Fair is fair. It is not consistent with justice, fairness, or the rules governing federal proceedings for the Plaintiff and her counsel to smear Defendant’s good name in ways that are calculated to feed media coverage and thus inflict maximum public relations damage while the core fact of Plaintiff’s identity, revelation of which stands to discredit her entire case, remains wholly hidden from view. Whereas Doe status is reserved for truly extraordinary cases and predicated upon extraordinary justification, here a multitude of powerful considerations cut precisely the opposite direction as other judges of this Court have ruled in cases involving the same circumstances.”
It’s also argued that Jay “has built an impeccable reputation” over the years, while Buzbee is further criticized for what’s characterized here as a “sprawling extortion saga” aimed at public figures and businesses once associated with Diddy. In September, Diddy was arrested in New York and later formally accused of trafficking and racketeering in an unsealed indictment. He remains behind bars.
Over the weekend, Jay’s name was added to the suit in question, spurring substantial social media attention and quickly delivered public statements from both Jay and Buzbee. Jay accused Buzbee of being behind a prior “blackmail attempt,” an allegation his team elaborated on in Monday’s motion.
“I have no idea how you have come to be such a deplorable human, Mr. Buzbee, but I promise you I have seen your kind many times over,” the statement read. “I’m more than prepared to deal with your type. You claim to be a marine? Marines are known for their valor, you have neither honor nor dignity.”
Buzbee, meanwhile, accused Jay of trying to “bully and harass” him and his client.
in HTML format, including tags, to make it appealing and easy to read for Japanese-speaking readers aged 20 to 40 interested in fashion. Organize the content with appropriate headings and subheadings (h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6), translating all text, including headings, into Japanese. Retain any existing
tags from
Jay-Z’s legal team says the Jane Doe accusing him of a 2000 rape alongside Diddy should have her identity “disclosed immediately.”
In a motion to deny plaintiff’s request to proceed anonymously, as pointed out by frequently cited independent reporter Meghann M. Cuniff, Jay calls for either the accuser’s identity to be revealed or for the complaint itself to be dismissed outright. The filing, dated Dec. 9, sees Jay’s legal team echoing many of the arguments made in a statement shared to Roc Nation’s X account over the weekend, including criticisms of the Texas-based lawyer behind the suit, Tony Buzbee.
“For months, an extortionate campaign has been targeting this named Defendant under cover of darkness,” the motion reads. “That campaign was cynical and calculated to force payment of an exorbitant sum of money. Defendant would have to pay X millions of dollars irrespective of the truth, or else.”
Jay “refused to pay” in response to this alleged effort, per the filing, at which point the accuser and “her self-promoting counsel” are said to have gone to “extraordinary lengths” in an effort to “shut down fair defense” on Jay’s side. Elsewhere in the docs, it’s argued that there is precedent for requiring the accuser’s name to be made public, with Jay’s legal team underscoring their previous criticisms of Buzbee, like so:
“Fair is fair. It is not consistent with justice, fairness, or the rules governing federal proceedings for the Plaintiff and her counsel to smear Defendant’s good name in ways that are calculated to feed media coverage and thus inflict maximum public relations damage while the core fact of Plaintiff’s identity, revelation of which stands to discredit her entire case, remains wholly hidden from view. Whereas Doe status is reserved for truly extraordinary cases and predicated upon extraordinary justification, here a multitude of powerful considerations cut precisely the opposite direction as other judges of this Court have ruled in cases involving the same circumstances.”
It’s also argued that Jay “has built an impeccable reputation” over the years, while Buzbee is further criticized for what’s characterized here as a “sprawling extortion saga” aimed at public figures and businesses once associated with Diddy. In September, Diddy was arrested in New York and later formally accused of trafficking and racketeering in an unsealed indictment. He remains behind bars.
Over the weekend, Jay’s name was added to the suit in question, spurring substantial social media attention and quickly delivered public statements from both Jay and Buzbee. Jay accused Buzbee of being behind a prior “blackmail attempt,” an allegation his team elaborated on in Monday’s motion.
“I have no idea how you have come to be such a deplorable human, Mr. Buzbee, but I promise you I have seen your kind many times over,” the statement read. “I’m more than prepared to deal with your type. You claim to be a marine? Marines are known for their valor, you have neither honor nor dignity.”
Buzbee, meanwhile, accused Jay of trying to “bully and harass” him and his client.
and integrate them seamlessly into the new content without adding new tags. Ensure the new content is fashion-related, written entirely in Japanese, and approximately 1500 words. Conclude with a “結論” section and a well-formatted “よくある質問” section. Avoid including an introduction or a note explaining the process.
