Rewrite 
Sean “Diddy” Combs has been denied his request to be released on bail for a third time on Wednesday. According to the ruling, obtained by reporter Meghann Cuniff, Judge Arun Subramanian wrote that “no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the safety of the community.”
Subramanian sided with prosecutor Christy Slavik’s argument that Combs cannot be trusted to abide by the most extreme restrictions, based on his previous Bureau of Prisons rules violations, which included conducting three-way phone calls and using the phone access code of other inmates.
According to ABC News, Subramanian also mentioned “evidence supporting a serious risk of witness tampering” contributed to his decision. Combs has been accused of sending text messages to a witness, an escort who received a grand jury subpoena due to their alleged participation in several “freak-offs.”
Diddy’s legal team previously denied any interference in the grand jury process.
Prosecutors also claimed Diddy’s children organized a social media campaign in an effort to “influence the jury pool.”
Subramanian determined “there is compelling evidence of Combs’s propensity for violence,” citing the 2016 surveillance video of Diddy attacking Cassie Ventura.
“Given the nature of the allegations in this case and the information provided by the government, the Court doubts the sufficiency of any conditions that place trust in Combs and individuals in his employ—like a private security detail—to follow those conditions,” Subramanian wrote.
in HTML format, including tags, to make it appealing and easy to read for Japanese-speaking readers aged 20 to 40 interested in fashion. Organize the content with appropriate headings and subheadings (h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6), translating all text, including headings, into Japanese. Retain any existing
tags from
Sean “Diddy” Combs has been denied his request to be released on bail for a third time on Wednesday. According to the ruling, obtained by reporter Meghann Cuniff, Judge Arun Subramanian wrote that “no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the safety of the community.”
Subramanian sided with prosecutor Christy Slavik’s argument that Combs cannot be trusted to abide by the most extreme restrictions, based on his previous Bureau of Prisons rules violations, which included conducting three-way phone calls and using the phone access code of other inmates.
According to ABC News, Subramanian also mentioned “evidence supporting a serious risk of witness tampering” contributed to his decision. Combs has been accused of sending text messages to a witness, an escort who received a grand jury subpoena due to their alleged participation in several “freak-offs.”
Diddy’s legal team previously denied any interference in the grand jury process.
Prosecutors also claimed Diddy’s children organized a social media campaign in an effort to “influence the jury pool.”
Subramanian determined “there is compelling evidence of Combs’s propensity for violence,” citing the 2016 surveillance video of Diddy attacking Cassie Ventura.
“Given the nature of the allegations in this case and the information provided by the government, the Court doubts the sufficiency of any conditions that place trust in Combs and individuals in his employ—like a private security detail—to follow those conditions,” Subramanian wrote.
and integrate them seamlessly into the new content without adding new tags. Ensure the new content is fashion-related, written entirely in Japanese, and approximately 1500 words. Conclude with a “結論” section and a well-formatted “よくある質問” section. Avoid including an introduction or a note explaining the process.
